Paulsen Speaks on the Issue of Origins
On Friday, the Adventist News Network posted a statement released by GC President Jan Paulsen appealing to all "engaged by our church in the ministries of administration, preaching, teaching, and writing to articulate and reflect our stand as a community on Creation."
It's no surprise this "appeal" came out as the issue of teaching evolution at Adventist schools is being hotly contested. Paulsen made no mention of any particular schools or any actions taken against any schools. He did acknowledge the understanding that, as part of an Adventist education, teachers "will also expose [students] to the elements and concepts of evolution."
Below is the entire appeal reprinted from the Adventist News Network.
: : :
I place this before you in awareness of an ongoing discussion in some quarters between faith and science, particularly as it relates to origins and creation.
For us as a community it has always been of utmost importance to stay close to the Scripture. Faith has that as its final point of reference. We must not allow ourselves to come adrift from the Bible in defining our values and in stating what we hold.
Our position as a church in the matter of origins is clearly although somewhat broadly stated in our Fundamental Beliefs. This position is further amplified in a statement voted by the General Conference Executive Committee at the 2004 Annual Council. To remind ourselves of the details of that action, I have included the wording in this appeal:
- "We strongly endorse the document's affirmation of our historic, biblical position of belief in a literal, recent, six-day Creation.
- We urge that the document, accompanied by this response, be disseminated widely throughout the world Seventh-day Adventist Church, using all available communication channels and in the major languages of world membership.
- We reaffirm the Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the historicity of Genesis 1-11: that the seven days of the Creation account were literal 24-hour days forming a week identical in time to what we now experience as a week; and that the Flood was global in nature.
- We call on all boards and educators at Seventh-day Adventist institutions at all levels to continue upholding and advocating the church's position on origins. We, along with Seventh-day Adventist parents, expect students to receive a thorough, balanced, and scientifically rigorous exposure to and affirmation of our historic belief in a literal, recent six-day creation, even as they are educated to understand and assess competing philosophies of origins that dominate scientific discussion in the contemporary world.
- We urge church leaders throughout the world to seek ways to educate members, especially young people attending non-Seventh-day Adventist schools, in the issues involved in the doctrine of creation.
- We call on all members of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist family to proclaim and teach the church's understanding of the biblical doctrine of Creation, living in its light, rejoicing in our status as sons and daughters of God, and praising our Lord Jesus Christ--our Creator and Redeemer."
I appeal to all engaged by our church in the ministries of administration, preaching, teaching, and writing to articulate and reflect our stand as a community on Creation. We are a faith-community, and the world of faith is the world in which God's creative powers are on constant display. Sometimes the findings of science may reflect some of this, but often not. Faith is certainly not subject to findings of science.
To those who teach at our colleges and universities, let me say that you have a demanding, often difficult, but sacred assignment. It is a ministry you hold in trust. It is understood that to care for your ministry responsibly you have to take your students on many a journey of findings into various disciplines of study. They need to know what they will meet in their profession and in life. As part of that exercise you will also expose them to the elements and concepts of evolution. That is understood.
As your pastor, however, I appeal to you that when you take your students out on the journey, you bring them safely back home before the day is over. And their home must always be in the world of faith. You owe it to the students, you owe it to God, you owe it to their parents, you owe it to the church, and you owe it to yourself as a believer to safely guide them through difficult moments on their journey.
This appeal comes with the greatest respect for your integrity and your professional skills. But you are also my sister and brother in faith, and we share a common commitment to God to whom we shall ultimately bring the fruits of our labor. I pray that he will give to each of us the strength that accompanies faithfulness.
Jan Paulsen

Comments
Re: Paulsen Speaks on the Issue of Origins
What, no comments from anyone at all? I thought this would have been the perfect place for both sides to clear the air.
What part of this message do "progressives" disagree with?
What part of this message do "conservatives" disagree with?
Re: Paulsen Speaks on the Issue of Origins
Richard L. Noel, DMD
Pastor Paulson speaks just like an administrator who desires all things to continue as the were from the beginning of the church. Unfortunately, his approach is willingly ignorant that great catastrophes and massive biblical research calls into question his desire for quiet on issues of ongoing study. Calling all to subscribe to the SDA CREED, is most offensive. It denies the right and duty of all to carefully study, think, pray and share their findings with each other in and open and honest forum without rancor. This last need has been greatly ignored by those who believe that all matters have already been settled and there is no more to learn or discuss.
As an example I will refer to EGW in CW. She there said we had much to "unlearn" as well as much to "learn". This process cannot go forward in a climate of rancor. A teacher who fears for his paycheck cannot be fully honest when he studies any subject. I know that SDA's have many favorite traditions. Some of these are much older than the SDA church. Some of them are completely wrong. An example is the belief that the sanctuary is the tabernacle. This is older than Christianity but it is wrong. Just read Numbers 10 and you will discover on the basis of verses 17 and 21 that is impossible for the tabernacle or even a room in it to be the sanctuary. When I discovered this it propelled me into an ongoing research project for the last 4 years. Many have been unwilling to even consider that the Bible is correct and we may be wrong.
Re: Paulsen Speaks on the Issue of Origins
Although this statement sounds very conservative to me, over at Spectrum, they are calling it "middle ground." I'm not sure why, but the liberals seem to know that Paulsen is their guy and, regardless what he says, he bears them no ill will. I do not follow SDA politics closely enough to know what this is based upon. Perhaps they believe that Paulsen is issuing this statement in reaction to the Asscherick letter about LaSierra, and that the statement is in lieu of a formal inquest that might lead to actual consequences. In other words, Paulsen is giving lip service to Adventist doctrines while refusing to do anything to rein in teachers at SDA colleges who are undermining those doctrines. It is the whole course of action, not the statement itself, that constitutes "middle ground."
Re: Paulsen Speaks on the Issue of Origins
nww
RIchard, I am disappointed in your attack on Elder Paulsen's comments. Your statments about him being "willingly ignorant" and that his call to us to support our church's clear position (not a creed!) is offensive, is an overreaction to say the least. In fact it is almost contravening the guidelines for this forum which state that we should "refrain from attacking the personal integrity of any other individual".
Unfortunately, your second paragraph is mostly irrelevant to the discussion and your last sentence seems to contradict the pious sounding concerns against Elder Paulsen's upholding the Bible view of origins in your first paragraph.