Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Inspired by some of the comments on the interview with David Pendleton, I thought I would-while sitting here in the Black Forest in Germany, totally unable to sleep (jet lag)-respond regarding some of the talk about Rome and its role in last day events.

First, as most of us know, King Nebuchadnezzar's dream in Daniel 2 was of a statue, world history symbolized in sculpture (Dan 2:31-45). The common interpretation of the gold head (Babylon), the silver arms and breast (Media-Persia), the brass belly and thighs (Greece), the iron legs (pagan Rome), the feet and toes, part iron and part clay (the divided nations of Europe) is not uniquely Adventist. Millions of Christians and Jews have interpreted the chapter this way. We are hardly the innovators of that one.

Now, unlike the first three kingdoms, whose metals stop after their demise, the iron of the fourth kingdom remains until the end of the world, even if in the feet and toes the iron is mixed with "miry clay" (Daniel 2:43). In other words, the fourth kingdom, which arose after Greece (and though changing form), extends to the end of the world (Daniel 2: 33,34, 40-44).

Now, let's be logical and reasonable. What one world power, and only one world power, arises after Greece and extends all the way to the end?

Duh? Might that be . . . . Rome?

Now, we have the same basic sequence in Daniel 7 and Daniel 8. In Daniel 7, the four beasts parallel the four metals in Daniel 2. In Daniel 7, the fourth kingdom, the one that arises after Greece, though changing form, continues to the end of the world (Daniel 7:19-28). Same four powers, just more details given and, as in Daniel 2, the fourth beast, the last earthly power, arises after Greece and come to the end of the world.

Again, what power arises after Greece and goes all up through today and into the future?

Hmmm.... I must be a bigoted, narrowed-minded-trapped-in-a-19th-century Weltanschauung traditional SDA but, again-Rome, solely, totally and only Rome, comes to mind. How could it not, because how it could be anything other than Rome? The fact is, it can't be. I need faith to believe in a lot of things, but not the identity of Rome in the prophecy.

In Daniel 8, the same thing occurs, the same sequence of powers (though Babylon not mentioned): there is Media-Persia, followed by Greece (they are named for us!), and the final power in the chapter. What power is that? It's the one that, as in Daniel 2 and 7, arises after Greece and, though changing some characteristics (symbolic of the transition from Pagan Rome to Papal Rome), endures to the end as well (Daniel 8:22-25).

In all three chapters, then, the power that arises after Greece's fall in the centuries before Christ remains until the end of time. What power could that be but, again, Rome?

Congratulations to David Pendleton. You've joined a church with a long history, one starting back with Romulus and Remus, continuing with the high priests of pagan Rome (whose title, by the way, was Pontifex Maximus), and extending right up to today and into the future.

You can read all about it in Daniel 2, 7, and 8.

Comments

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Just a note, Cliff. The story of Romulus and Remus is a myth. But it is telling how you mix that story seamlessly into your master allegorical narrative.

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

I know it's a myth, but my question is, Show me where I'm wrong on my interpretation of that power as solely, totally, and only Rome. What else could it possibly be? Clifford Goldstein

Staff Blogger, Adventist Today

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Nic Samojluk, Editor www.sdaforum.com There is no question, the Bible makes it patently clear that Rome remains on the world's scene till the end. The question is: How do you identify Rome, by its past or its present behavior? We have labeled the church of Rome as the "Beast of Revelation," and we identify it by the enigmatic 666 number. What do "beasts" of prey do? They attack, kill, and devour the weak. Is this what the Catholic Church is doing today? It is true, it did perform the beastly function of predatory animals in the past through its infamous Inquisition. Should we judge individuals and institutions by their past behavior or its present character? Is the Catholic Church today persecuting and killing innocent human beings today? If it is not, then we have a problem. Take the issue of abortion, for example. What earthly power is behind the destruction of the unborn? Is it the Catholic church? If the Catholic Church and the current Popes are fearlessly defending the right of the unborn, while the "Remnant" church is justifying the extermination of the innocent, and if some our hospitals are engaged in the provision of elective abortion services, while the Catholic hospitals refuse to follow suit, then tell me, please: Judging on the beastly character of institutions, who is the "Beast of Revelation"? Have you read our SDA Church official Guidelines on Abortion? You find lofty statements about the sanctity of human life, but when you read the fine print, you discover that it states that Jesus died to grant us "freedom of choice." If this is true, then perhaps Jesus also died in order to grant us the right to rape, steal, and sexually abuse little children. Do you have an answer for me on this issue?

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Cliff, explain how the identification of Rome will inspire me to be compassionate today? Re your humorous comment on the other page: I don't think you have any idea how AToday has been such an important voice for many of us and therefore constructive. Nic, interesting to look at the positive in the Catholic church, I have recently been researching that. Re your comment on abortion: I'm glad that our SDA guidelines have allowed mother's to have a choice to come to one of our health centers; they will go somewhere to get their abortions. If I had walked in any of these women's shoes I might have made the same choice; I'm so glad it is God judging them and not humans.

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

The bottom-line is what do the Scriptures clearly teach? Rome, Rome, Rome. That the papacy might now not be burning people at the stake is no testimony to her supposed change; she doesn't burn folks because she can't. Give her the chance, and I believe she'd do just what she did in the past. Rome as an institution, through its whole system of sacraments, totally usurps the gospel. Anyone who truly loves the gospel, loves the plan of salvation, must be horrified by what Rome has done to it. It truly is anti-Christ, in the sense that the Roman church has taken upon itself all that we have through Christ. According to Rome, you get it all only through the institution of Rome, which is the only mediator of Christ's gifts. Who cares what some of the "good" things Rome does? The Bible is utterly unequivocal on the topic of what it is and its role in last day events. We can believe what it says, or throw in "red herrings" about the SDA position on abortion and the like. Clifford Goldstein

Staff Blogger, Adventist Today

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Ella M Cliff, I can agree with the time line--though that is not the Gospel we are to be spreading. We need to be very careful in separating the system from the people. My cousin growing up under this Catholic persecution complex was afraid to pass Catholic churches and even wondering if they had torture chambers inside. At the time of EGW there was a lot of anti-Catholic feeling in this country. And as much as we try to seperate people from the system, to me this leads to fear and misunderstanding and even hatred. I can understand Pendleton's hesitancy about preaching antiCathlicism to third-world people where tribal hatred is the norm and it can be transferred to another group different from us. It also leaves a lot of questions--what about Islam? Orthodox Christians? I can't imagine in my wildest dreams Islam and Catholicism uniting. (There is a possibility with both looking to a coming "messiah" and believing in immortality of the soul--but they are looking for different things.) What about conditional prophecy--we find it in the Bible--but not in Ellen White? I doesn't add up. I could never be a Catholic because of the beliefs you mention. This makes me wonder does the Bible only focus on the Christian world? I can't imagine Sunday laws in today's climate either with Muslims and Jews in this country--so maybe a lot more has to happen, and I believe there are a lot more issues than a worship day that will be important--I think it is one of many.

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Ella M Cliff, I can agree with the time line--though that is not the Gospel we are to be spreading. We need to be very careful in separating the system from the people. My cousin growing up under this Catholic persecution complex was afraid to pass Catholic churches and even wondering if they had torture chambers inside. At the time of EGW there was a lot of anti-Catholic feeling in this country. And as much as we try to seperate people from the system, to me this leads to fear and misunderstanding and even hatred. I can understand Pendleton's hesitancy about preaching antiCathlicism to third-world people where tribal hatred is the norm and it can be transferred to another group different from us. It also leaves a lot of questions--what about Islam? Orthodox Christians? I can't imagine in my wildest dreams Islam and Catholicism uniting. (There is a possibility with both looking to a coming "messiah" and believing in immortality of the soul--but they are looking for different things.) What about conditional prophecy--we find it in the Bible--but not in Ellen White? I doesn't add up. I could never be a Catholic because of the beliefs you mention. This makes me wonder does the Bible only focus on the Christian world? I can't imagine Sunday laws in today's climate either with Muslims and Jews in this country--so maybe a lot more has to happen, and I believe there are a lot more issues than a worship day that will be important--I think it is one of many.

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Ella-- I agree that some aspects of our end-time scenario seem difficult to envision now, but so what? I remember 25 years ago unable to comprehend how America could ever be in a postition to enforce its will upon the world because of the power of the Soviet Union. What--was the Soviet Union going to disappear or something? I remember, too, an issue of Spectrum (the old Spectrum, the closed-mined, narrow-minded, bigoted Spectrum of yesteryear) had a brilliant article (weren't they all? Just ask the former editor, he'll tell you himself) declaring that our "traditional" view of prophecy about Rome was wrong and we had admit that the final persecuting power was--the Soviet Union! Atta boy, Roy! Wonder if the current editor will continue such a wonderful tradition? (With that idiotic article by John Jones on homosexuality, it sure looks like it). Clifford Goldstein

Staff Blogger, Adventist Today

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Nic Samojluk, Editor www.sdaforum.com Dadu: Yes, and there is much more we could say that is positive about the Catholic Church. Take, for example, the influence of Mother Teresa. A church that could produce such a saintly woman cannot be all that bad. No other denomination has ever turned a human being into such a loving individual. But I have a question for you. You stated regarding people involved in abortion that you are glad that "it is God judging them and not humans." Would you say the same about those involved in rape, burglary, and child abuse? If not, then on what basis do you establish a difference? Doesn't society force rapists, criminals, and child abusers to account for such crimes? Why give a carte blanche to those who either poison or dismember innocent babies before they are born, and sometimes while they are being born? A victim of rape, burglary, or child abuse may eventually recover and enjoy life. Those who are murdered before they have a chance to see the light of day are permanently deprived of the same God given right.

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Nic Samojluk, Editor www.sdaforum.com Cliff: What you say about Rome is true regarding its past, its prophetic future, and its role in obscuring the true Gospel of salvation. Nevertheless, I must question your characterization of abortion as a "red herring." For Mother Teresa, James and Ellen White, and the other leading SDA pioneers abortion was plain murder, and so it is in the sight of Almighty God, I believe. I once asked a respectable SDA physicians about the mother of Jesus, and he responded that he would have had no problem performing an abortion for her had she requested one. Another leading SDA recently published an article stating that the unborn has no right to life until he has taken the first breath. This attitude flies in the face of everything Scripture stands for. Jesus told us that anybody who offended any of these little ones would do well to hang a stone around his neck and jumped into the sea. The Bible tells us that children should not be put to death for the sin of their parents, yet we justify abortion that results from the sin of adultery. The Catholic Church is wrong about the Gospel, about the Sabbath, and about the state of the dead, but it is right about the state of the living! Which is morally worse, to worship God on the wrong day of the week or to be responsible for the death of innocent human beings? Do not forget that Sabbath keepers were the ones who took the life of the most innocent being in the entire universe: Jesus Christ. Not long ago, the leaders of the German and Austrian SDA Church apologized for their cooperation with the Nazi genocide [http://sdaforum.com/page47.html], and now we are making the same mistake about the genocide of the unborn. Fortunately, there is one person at the General Conference who seems to share my concerns about this atrocity: James Standish [http://www.religiousliberty.info/blog/?p=58]. God bless!

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Look, this thread wasn't about abortion, it was about Rome, and the role of Rome in prophecy. The fact that you bring up problems in the SDA church (and, yes, I agree, abortions in our hospitals are bad news, for sure), is a red herring because it isn't the issue. Oh, so Rome is now no longer the last power in all those prophecies because they don't perform abortions at their hospitals and we do? I fail to see the connection with the topic. Clifford Goldstein Staff Blogger, Adventist Today

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Nic Samojluk, Editor www.sdaforum.com Cliff: Let me suggest that you fail to see the connection between abortion and Rome simply because you refuse to see the larger picture. It it true that your blog is about Rome, but you wrote it in response to David Pendleton's experience who abandoned the SDA Church and joined the Catholic communion of faith. Evidently you feel that he made a mistake, and that the Adventist Church is destined to be more faithful than the one he now embraced, while Rome is doomed to play the role assigned to it by prophecy. My guess is that you are misinterpreting the true role of prophetic utterances. I see prophecy as a warning about what might happen if people and institutions do not repent, while you tend to look at divine predictions as means by which we can read tomorrow's news events. Jesus told the story of two sons. One of them willingly said he would work in his father's vineyard, while the other refused. At the end the opposite took place. Jacob, the patriarch, predicted that the descendants of Levi would be dispersed in Israel as a result of Levi's misbehavior. That prediction became a blessing for Levi's descendants instead of a curse because Levi repented of his sin. I suggest that you would do well not to assume that because the Catholic Church played an evil role in the past that it is destined to do so till the end. As far as persecution is concerned, it may play said role again, or it may not. In the past the Popes persecuted the innocents, today they are protecting them. How can you fail to see the connection between Rome and the abortion issue? It is crystal clear to me! Contrast this with our own "Remnant" Church. Our pioneers condemned abortion in the strongest terms, while we justify the genocide of the unborn. Our church was never tested with absolute power like the Popes of Rome. In Germany, our church failed the test during the Nazi regime, and had to apologize later on. If we failed then, and are failing now again by condoning the current genocide, can you guarantee that we will be faithful at the end? The Bible says: "If running against men has wearied you, how will you race against horses?"

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Nic-- I don't want to get in a debate over this: what I want to show, and what I want to challenge ANYONE on is our interpretation of the last power in those three prophecies. That is the issue; not the SDA church's stand on abortion. Clifford Goldstein

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

It's time people stopped arguing as if the Inquisitions (yes, there were more than one) and the Crusades are the evidence that the Roman Catholic Church persecuted people, in particular, Jews and Christians (from the standpoint of God's people in Scripture). One only has to go back to the 20th century (not that long ago) to see how it operated: Abyssinia (modern Ethiopia), Slovakia (1940s and 1990s), Croatia, Argentina, Chile, Rwanda--one could compile quite a list of horrific persecution, torture, murder, and execution by Roman Catholic clerics and their followers. No, this does not indict the entire community; it is obvious that millions are devoted believers in justice and the humane treatment of others. But Scripture is speaking of major powers, and this would include the institutional hierarchy and leadership. One must not forget that not only Roman Catholic leaders, but also Protestant, Islamic, and Hindu leaders (for example) persecuted others, and many times in a ghastly manner. That's not the point, however, since the prophetic lines cannot be adequately understood with those religious traditions in mind (cf. Dan 2, 7, 8, Rev 13, etc.).

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

That's the point; thank you, Orion777. The issue isn't how bad others are; the issue is the Bible is perfectly clear about the role of Rome. It can't be anything else. Cliff

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Nic Samojluk, Editor www.sdaforum.com Cliff: I understand.The Bible makes it very clear that the last persecuting power is the "Beast of Revelation." There is no argument over this! The question is: How do we identify this enigmatic "beast: " By its number, its historical connection, or by its character? If we as a church do what beasts of prey do, kill and justify the killing of innocent human beings, then we partake of the image of the beast. I just finished reading the article you wrote for "Signs of the Times." In it you identify the "Remnant" as those who keep God's Commandments. One of them prohibids the shedding of innocent blood. If we justify the shedding of innocent blood, we can't claim to be God's Remnant! That's all!

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Richard L. Noel, DMD Cliff, I am interested in how you focused so completely on the earthly aspects of the little horn power in both daniel 7 and 8. I believe your position would be strengthened if you would focus on what Daniel 8 focuses on. It focuses on the Spiritual powers found in the earthly kingdoms. The Little Horn of Daniel 8 comes from a source that is amazingly like Satan himself prior to his fall as the covering cherub. See the 4 winds of the heavens in Ezekiel and where the ressurecting power is exercised for the valley of dry bones. It comes from one of the four winds. The Little Horn is a spiritual power behind the governments and apostate religion of Rome. We need more focus on the earthly fulfillment of prophecy to complete our exigesis of Daniel 8.

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

I have appreciated the very thoughtful comments posted here. And I agree with Cliff that the thread is about the Roman Catholic church fulfilling prophecy not abortion. Let me pose another question related to the one Cliff is posing. If the Catholic church will fulfill everything Adventists have taught about what the book of Revelation says, will Adventism fulfill everything we have taught about the role of the Remnant? If the Remnant is failing to fulfill its role in every detail could that also apply to the Catholic church? Adventism has clearly failed. We were supposed to go home with Jesus in the 19th century. So what are we still doing here and do we still have the same mission? And is that mission wrapped up with the Catholic church? It is easy to talk about the Catholics but what about pointing the finger in the other direction and ask about who we are? Paul said in Romans 2:1, "You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things."

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Good point. In both Daniel 7 and 8, a heavenly element is involved, especialy when one looks at the depiction of the little horn's attack in Daniel 8. My main point, however, was to show how Rome fits the prophecy, and other interpretations, which are becoming more common among us, both on the far left and the far right, are wrong. Clifford Goldstein

Re: Solely, Totally and Only Rome

Ella M In answer to your "so what?" it makes us just like the other tribes that think other groups are their enemy. This is especially true in some cultures. As we saw in Rwanda, apparently hatred for other groups--and seeing them as enemies is stronger than Christian values. There is a place for caution but not hostilitiy. The history of the church (Roman Catholicsim was always "the church" and we came out of it as did most of our ancestors). This was after the early church fell into apostacy, yet God still had His people in that church down through the ages as pagan as it was. After just reading a 800+ page book on ancient world history, the acts of Roman Catholicism were hardly different from all their contemporaries, and early Judaism not much better. We need to avoid verbal violence as well as physical.

Why I shouldn't wonder why?

The first thing that came to my mind when I read about David Pendleton's move was: "why in the world"??

Well, I don't know why. Neither I know why one third of the heaven's angels decided to follow Lucifer.

What I certainly know is that it's just one more fit of Rome as Revelation's beast: "The whole world was astonished and followed the beast" (Rev. 13:3)

Nowadays many people is thinking this way:

"The defenders of the papacy declare that the church has been maligned, and the Protestant world are inclined to accept the statement. Many urge that it is unjust to judge the church of today by the abominations and absurdities that marked her reign during the centuries of ignorance and darkness. They excuse her horrible cruelty as the result of the barbarism of the times and plead that the influence of modern civilization has changed her sentiments." (Great Controversy, Liberty of Conscience Threatened) 

We need to study profecies in depth in order to stand firm in the truth in spite of appearances.

 

Clifford Goldstein's picture
Clifford GoldsteinClifford Goldstein, a top-selling author and leading conservative voice, has authored 20 books and hundreds of magazine articles. He is editor of the Adult Bible Study Guide and also edited Liberty and Shabbat Shalom. Clifford blogs on current issues and traditional Adventist teachings--and will take reader questions.